Files
money/internal/rules/rules_test.go
T
nikolaandClaude Opus 5 5ca6cff87b Remove the transfer flag
A transfer was a second verdict carried alongside the tag: a boolean set by
transfer = true in a rule or by x in the TUI, kept in its own pair of rule_
and manual_ columns, whose one real effect was to hold the row out of the
report. The rest of it was display -- a T column in the transaction list, in
the rules screen and in money ls.

Money moved between your own accounts is now tagged like anything else and
counts like anything else. The leg leaving checking is an outflow and the leg
arriving in savings is an inflow, so a report over the whole data root roughly
nets out while one scoped to a single account or month does not. That is the
price of one verdict per transaction instead of two.

A rule now needs a tag, and one that set only transfer = true is refused by
number on load. A leftover transfer key beside a tag is ignored, as unknown
TOML keys always were, and an index built by an older binary drops both
columns when it is opened.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 23:07:47 +02:00

231 lines
6.9 KiB
Go

package rules
import (
"path/filepath"
"testing"
"git.petrovv.com/nikola/money/internal/config"
"git.petrovv.com/nikola/money/internal/model"
"git.petrovv.com/nikola/money/internal/store"
)
func testDB(t *testing.T) *store.DB {
t.Helper()
db, err := store.Open(filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "index.db"))
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
t.Cleanup(func() { db.Close() })
return db
}
// seed inserts transactions with no rule verdict yet.
func seed(t *testing.T, db *store.DB, descriptions ...string) int64 {
t.Helper()
accountID, err := db.UpsertAccount(model.Account{
Slug: "checking", Name: "Checking", Currency: "EUR", MinorDigits: 2,
})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
sourceID, err := db.SourceFile(accountID, "checking/st.csv", "sha", "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z")
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
for i, d := range descriptions {
added, err := db.InsertTransaction(model.Transaction{
AccountID: accountID,
SourceFileID: sourceID,
Fingerprint: d,
Date: "2026-01-0" + string(rune('1'+i)),
Description: d,
AmountMinor: -1000,
})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if !added {
t.Fatalf("seed %q was not inserted", d)
}
}
return accountID
}
func byDescription(t *testing.T, db *store.DB, desc string) model.Transaction {
t.Helper()
txns, err := db.Transactions(store.Filter{})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
for _, x := range txns {
if x.Description == desc {
return x
}
}
t.Fatalf("no transaction with description %q", desc)
return model.Transaction{}
}
// A manual tag must outlive any number of rule changes and re-runs. This is
// the property that makes retag safe to run at will.
func TestManualTagSurvivesRetag(t *testing.T) {
db := testDB(t)
seed(t, db, "LIDL SOFIA", "SOME RANDOM SHOP")
engine := New(&config.Rules{Rule: []config.Rule{
{Match: "*LIDL*", Tag: "groceries"},
}})
if _, err := engine.Retag(db); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
// The user hand-tags the row the rules did not match, and overrides the
// one they did.
shop := byDescription(t, db, "SOME RANDOM SHOP")
if err := db.SetManualTag(shop.ID, "hobby"); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
lidl := byDescription(t, db, "LIDL SOFIA")
if err := db.SetManualTag(lidl.ID, "party supplies"); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
// Rules change completely, and are re-applied twice for good measure.
engine = New(&config.Rules{Rule: []config.Rule{
{Match: "*LIDL*", Tag: "food"},
{Match: "*SHOP*", Tag: "shopping"},
}})
for range 2 {
if _, err := engine.Retag(db); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
}
shop = byDescription(t, db, "SOME RANDOM SHOP")
if got := shop.Tag(); got != "hobby" {
t.Errorf("manual tag = %q, want %q (manual tags must win)", got, "hobby")
}
if shop.RuleTag != "shopping" {
t.Errorf("rule_tag = %q, want %q (rules must still be recorded underneath)", shop.RuleTag, "shopping")
}
lidl = byDescription(t, db, "LIDL SOFIA")
if got := lidl.Tag(); got != "party supplies" {
t.Errorf("manual override = %q, want %q", got, "party supplies")
}
// Clearing the override falls back to whatever the rules now say.
if err := db.ClearOverrides(lidl.ID); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if got := byDescription(t, db, "LIDL SOFIA").Tag(); got != "food" {
t.Errorf("after clearing override, tag = %q, want %q", got, "food")
}
}
func TestFirstMatchWins(t *testing.T) {
engine := New(&config.Rules{Rule: []config.Rule{
{Match: "*LIDL EXPRESS*", Tag: "snacks"},
{Match: "*LIDL*", Tag: "groceries"},
}})
if tag := engine.Apply("checking", "CARD LIDL EXPRESS 12"); tag != "snacks" {
t.Errorf("tag = %q, want snacks (earlier rule must win)", tag)
}
if tag := engine.Apply("checking", "CARD LIDL 12"); tag != "groceries" {
t.Errorf("tag = %q, want groceries", tag)
}
if tag := engine.Apply("checking", "SOMETHING ELSE"); tag != "" {
t.Errorf("tag = %q, want empty for an unmatched description", tag)
}
}
// A rule can be dead two ways: nothing matches it, or an earlier rule already
// claimed everything it would have caught. Usage must report both as zero.
func TestUsageCountsFirstMatchOnly(t *testing.T) {
engine := New(&config.Rules{Rule: []config.Rule{
{Match: "*LIDL*", Tag: "groceries"}, // claims both LIDL rows
{Match: "*LIDL SOFIA*", Tag: "shadowed"}, // fully shadowed by the above
{Match: "*NOTHING MATCHES ME*", Tag: "no"}, // matches nothing at all
{Match: "*PAYROLL*", Tag: "salary"}, // claims one row
}})
txns := []model.Transaction{
{AccountSlug: "checking", Description: "LIDL SOFIA 4412"},
{AccountSlug: "checking", Description: "LIDL VARNA 9911"},
{AccountSlug: "checking", Description: "ACME PAYROLL"},
{AccountSlug: "checking", Description: "UNMATCHED SHOP"},
}
usage := engine.Usage(txns)
want := []int{2, 0, 0, 1}
if len(usage) != len(want) {
t.Fatalf("usage has %d entries, want %d", len(usage), len(want))
}
for i := range want {
if usage[i] != want[i] {
t.Errorf("rule %d used by %d transactions, want %d", i+1, usage[i], want[i])
}
}
}
func TestMatchIndex(t *testing.T) {
engine := New(&config.Rules{Rule: []config.Rule{
{Match: "*LIDL EXPRESS*", Tag: "snacks"},
{Match: "*LIDL*", Tag: "groceries"},
}})
if got := engine.MatchIndex("checking", model.Transaction{Description: "LIDL EXPRESS 1"}); got != 0 {
t.Errorf("index = %d, want 0", got)
}
if got := engine.MatchIndex("checking", model.Transaction{Description: "LIDL 1"}); got != 1 {
t.Errorf("index = %d, want 1", got)
}
if got := engine.MatchIndex("checking", model.Transaction{Description: "OTHER"}); got != -1 {
t.Errorf("index = %d, want -1 for no match", got)
}
}
func TestAccountScopedRule(t *testing.T) {
engine := New(&config.Rules{Rule: []config.Rule{
{Match: "*TRANSFER*", Tag: "transfer", Account: "savings"},
{Match: "*TRANSFER*", Tag: "misc"},
}})
if tag := engine.Apply("savings", "TRANSFER FROM CHECKING"); tag != "transfer" {
t.Errorf("savings: tag = %q, want transfer", tag)
}
if tag := engine.Apply("checking", "TRANSFER FROM CHECKING"); tag != "misc" {
t.Errorf("checking: tag = %q, want misc", tag)
}
}
// Besides the description, a rule can match the bank's own classification of
// the transaction, on its own or alongside a description glob.
func TestTypeRules(t *testing.T) {
engine := New(&config.Rules{Rule: []config.Rule{
{Type: "CARD_PAYMENT", Match: "*LIDL*", Tag: "groceries"},
{Type: "ATM", Tag: "cash"},
}})
// A rule setting several patterns requires all of them to match.
tag := engine.ApplyTxn("checking", model.Transaction{
Description: "LIDL SOFIA", Type: "CARD_PAYMENT",
})
if tag != "groceries" {
t.Errorf("tag = %q, want groceries", tag)
}
tag = engine.ApplyTxn("checking", model.Transaction{
Description: "LIDL SOFIA", Type: "TRANSFER",
})
if tag != "" {
t.Errorf("tag = %q, want empty: the type does not match", tag)
}
// Type alone works too.
if tag := engine.ApplyTxn("checking", model.Transaction{
Description: "WITHDRAWAL", Type: "ATM",
}); tag != "cash" {
t.Errorf("tag = %q, want cash", tag)
}
}