nikola/money
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove the transfer flag

Browse Source 
A transfer was a second verdict carried alongside the tag: a boolean set by
transfer = true in a rule or by x in the TUI, kept in its own pair of rule_
and manual_ columns, whose one real effect was to hold the row out of the
report. The rest of it was display -- a T column in the transaction list, in
the rules screen and in money ls.

Money moved between your own accounts is now tagged like anything else and
counts like anything else. The leg leaving checking is an outflow and the leg
arriving in savings is an inflow, so a report over the whole data root roughly
nets out while one scoped to a single account or month does not. That is the
price of one verdict per transaction instead of two.

A rule now needs a tag, and one that set only transfer = true is refused by
number on load. A leftover transfer key beside a tag is ignored, as unknown
TOML keys always were, and an index built by an older binary drops both
columns when it is opened.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
nikola
2026-08-11 23:07:47 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 16c2585637
commit 5ca6cff87b
13 changed files with 114 additions and 277 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
internal/rules/rules_test.go
+11 -72
View File
@@ -128,13 +128,13 @@ func TestFirstMatchWins(t *testing.T) {
{Match: "*LIDL EXPRESS*", Tag: "snacks"},
{Match: "*LIDL*", Tag: "groceries"},
}})
if tag, _ := engine.Apply("checking", "CARD LIDL EXPRESS 12"); tag != "snacks" {
if tag := engine.Apply("checking", "CARD LIDL EXPRESS 12"); tag != "snacks" {
t.Errorf("tag = %q, want snacks (earlier rule must win)", tag)
}
if tag, _ := engine.Apply("checking", "CARD LIDL 12"); tag != "groceries" {
if tag := engine.Apply("checking", "CARD LIDL 12"); tag != "groceries" {
t.Errorf("tag = %q, want groceries", tag)
}
if tag, _ := engine.Apply("checking", "SOMETHING ELSE"); tag != "" {
if tag := engine.Apply("checking", "SOMETHING ELSE"); tag != "" {
t.Errorf("tag = %q, want empty for an unmatched description", tag)
}
}
@@ -187,17 +187,15 @@ func TestMatchIndex(t *testing.T) {
func TestAccountScopedRule(t *testing.T) {
engine := New(&config.Rules{Rule: []config.Rule{
{Match: "*TRANSFER*", Tag: "transfer", Transfer: true, Account: "savings"},
{Match: "*TRANSFER*", Tag: "transfer", Account: "savings"},
{Match: "*TRANSFER*", Tag: "misc"},
}})
tag, transfer := engine.Apply("savings", "TRANSFER FROM CHECKING")
if tag != "transfer" || !transfer {
t.Errorf("savings: tag=%q transfer=%v, want transfer/true", tag, transfer)
if tag := engine.Apply("savings", "TRANSFER FROM CHECKING"); tag != "transfer" {
t.Errorf("savings: tag = %q, want transfer", tag)
}
tag, transfer = engine.Apply("checking", "TRANSFER FROM CHECKING")
if tag != "misc" || transfer {
t.Errorf("checking: tag=%q transfer=%v, want misc/false", tag, transfer)
if tag := engine.Apply("checking", "TRANSFER FROM CHECKING"); tag != "misc" {
t.Errorf("checking: tag = %q, want misc", tag)
}
}
@@ -210,13 +208,13 @@ func TestTypeRules(t *testing.T) {
}})
// A rule setting several patterns requires all of them to match.
tag, _ := engine.ApplyTxn("checking", model.Transaction{
tag := engine.ApplyTxn("checking", model.Transaction{
Description: "LIDL SOFIA", Type: "CARD_PAYMENT",
})
if tag != "groceries" {
t.Errorf("tag = %q, want groceries", tag)
}
tag, _ = engine.ApplyTxn("checking", model.Transaction{
tag = engine.ApplyTxn("checking", model.Transaction{
Description: "LIDL SOFIA", Type: "TRANSFER",
})
if tag != "" {
@@ -224,68 +222,9 @@ func TestTypeRules(t *testing.T) {
}
// Type alone works too.
if tag, _ := engine.ApplyTxn("checking", model.Transaction{
if tag := engine.ApplyTxn("checking", model.Transaction{
Description: "WITHDRAWAL", Type: "ATM",
}); tag != "cash" {
t.Errorf("tag = %q, want cash", tag)
}
}
// Transfers can also be overridden by hand, independently of the tag.
func TestManualTransferOverride(t *testing.T) {
db := testDB(t)
seed(t, db, "TRANSFER TO SAVINGS")
engine := New(&config.Rules{Rule: []config.Rule{
{Match: "*TO SAVINGS*", Tag: "transfer", Transfer: true},
}})
if _, err := engine.Retag(db); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
txn := byDescription(t, db, "TRANSFER TO SAVINGS")
if !txn.IsTransfer() {
t.Fatal("expected the rule to mark this as a transfer")
}
no := false
if err := db.SetManualTransfer(txn.ID, &no); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if _, err := engine.Retag(db); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if byDescription(t, db, "TRANSFER TO SAVINGS").IsTransfer() {
t.Error("manual transfer override was lost on retag")
}
}
func TestUntaggedFilter(t *testing.T) {
db := testDB(t)
seed(t, db, "LIDL SOFIA", "SOME RANDOM SHOP")
engine := New(&config.Rules{Rule: []config.Rule{{Match: "*LIDL*", Tag: "groceries"}}})
if _, err := engine.Retag(db); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
untagged, err := db.Transactions(store.Filter{Untagged: true})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if len(untagged) != 1 || untagged[0].Description != "SOME RANDOM SHOP" {
t.Fatalf("untagged = %+v, want only SOME RANDOM SHOP", untagged)
}
// A manual tag must remove the row from the untagged view.
if err := db.SetManualTag(untagged[0].ID, "hobby"); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
untagged, err = db.Transactions(store.Filter{Untagged: true})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if len(untagged) != 0 {
t.Errorf("untagged = %+v, want none", untagged)
}
}